[Research] 60-minute Workouts WORSE than 30-minute?
In a new study published in the American Journal of Physiology, scientists found that 30-minute workouts resulted in the same amount of weight loss as 60-minute workouts.
This despite the fact that the 60-minute workouts burned TWICE the calories (600 per workout) as the 30-minute workouts (only 300 calories per workout).
At the end of 13 weeks, the 30-minute workout group lost 8.8 pounds of fat, while the 60-minute workout group lost 8.4 pounds...only slightly less, of course, but still, you'd expect MORE fat loss if you trained TWICE as long, right?
Strange, isn't it?
In fact, the scientists couldn't even explain these disappointing results from the longer workouts. But they DO know that there is some type of compensation that occurs giving your LESS results from LONGER workouts.
That clearly makes 60 minute workouts WORSE than 30-minute workouts, at least in my opinion.
Bizarro workout world, I agree. But bottom line...
Long 60-minute workouts aren't necessary.
And worse, long workouts probably lead to more overuse injury.
Oh, and one more thing...
Craig Ballantyne, Certified Turbulence Trainer, has designed several workout programs that have been used in published scientific studies.
And he says, "The BAD NEWS about studies is that they are often limited by the training methods available. They often use generic workouts and machines."
So just imagine the fat loss results you could get from a professionally designed, cutting-edge 30 minute workout...
Like the new Turbulence Training Thermogenic-30.
This 4-week program contains three 30-minute workouts. They don't take a minute longer, and yet they'll give you maximum fat burning results.
It's on sale this week only and this is the perfect time of year for short, at-home fat burning workouts that do NOT require you to go to the gym.
Enjoy these two workouts.
And get more results from less training,
PS - I want to hear about your results from this program.